{"id":13760,"date":"2009-04-06T15:42:50","date_gmt":"2009-04-06T13:42:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.curaj.net\/?p=13760"},"modified":"2009-04-06T15:45:21","modified_gmt":"2009-04-06T13:45:21","slug":"miine-cedo-va-face-publice-alte-3-decizii-impotriva-rmoldova-4-contra-romaniei-si","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/?p=13760","title":{"rendered":"M\u00eeine CEDO va face publice 3 decizii noi \u00eempotriva R.Moldova, 4 contra Rom\u00e2niei \u015fi&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">&#8230; pe 9 aprilie, printre altele, se vor pronun\u0163a alte 8 hot\u0103r\u00eeri contra Federa\u0163iei Ruse. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova (No. 4) <\/span><!--more--> (no. 18491\/07)<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\">The applicants are: Hyde Park, a non-governmental  organisation registered with the Moldovan Ministry of Justice at the  time of the events, since replaced by Hyde Park unincorporated association;  and, eight Moldovan nationals, Oleg Brega, Anatolie Juraveli, Roman  Cotelea, Mariana Galescu, Radu Vasilascu, Vitalie Dragan, Angela Lungu  and Anatol Hristea-Stan. In August 2006 the applicants took part in  a demonstration to protest about Chi\u015fin\u0103u town hall\u2019s refusal to  erect a monument donated by Romania; the protest was broken up by the  police and the applicants were detained and taken to Buiucani Police  Station where they were charged with unlawful assembly and resisting  arrest. The applicants complain in particular about the authorities\u2019  refusal to authorise their demonstration, the unlawfulness of their  arrest, the conditions of their detention at the police station and  the unfairness of the ensuing proceedings they brought against the police  officers who had arrested them. They rely on Articles 3 (prohibition  of inhuman or degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security),  6 (right to a fair hearing), 8 (right to respect for private and family  life), 11 (freedom of assembly and association) and 13 (right to an  effective remedy).<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Breabin v. Moldova <\/span>(no. 12544\/08)<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\">The applicant, Dumitru Breabin, is a Moldovan national  who was born in 1959 and lives in Chi\u015fin\u0103u. Summonsed to the Ministry  of Internal Affairs in December 2004 on suspicion of forgery, Mr Breabin  alleges that two police officers beat him with truncheons and punched  him in the head in order to try to force him into a confession. Relying  on Articles\u00a03 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and\u00a013 (right  to an effective remedy), he complains about the ill-treatment to which  he was subjected and the ensuing inadequacy of the investigation into  his allegations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Straisteanu and Others v. Moldova <\/span>(no.  4834\/06)<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\">The applicants are three Moldovan nationals, Gheorghe  Straisteanu, a well-known businessman and former Member of Parliament,  Natalia Straisteanu and Daniela Straisteanu, who were born in 1954,  1957 and 1986 respectively. They are members of the same family and  live in Chi\u015fin\u0103u. The fourth applicant is SRL Codrana-Lux, a limited  liability company incorporated in Moldova, the majority of which is  owned by the applicant family. The case concerns the applicants\u2019 complaint  that they were the victims of government harassment and intimidation.  All the applicants complain that the Government tried to pressure them  into giving up property they owned and that proceedings in which the  authorities sought to annul the contracts of lease and sale of that  property were unfair. Gheorghe Straisteanu also alleges that the harassment  had included him being arrested in 2005 and 2006 and charged with car  theft and uttering death threats; he complains in particular about the  unlawfulness and conditions of his detention. They rely in particular  on Article\u00a03 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article  5 (right to liberty and security), Article 6 (right to a fair hearing)  and Article\u00a01 of Protocol No.\u00a01 (protection of property).<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Br\u00e2ndu\u015fe v. Romania <\/span>(no. 6586\/03)<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\">The applicant, Ioan Br\u00e2ndu\u015fe, is a Romanian national  who was born 1951. Sentenced to ten years\u2019 imprisonment for fraud,  he is currently detained in Arad Prison (Romania). Relying on Article  3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), the applicant complains  of the conditions of detention in police premises in Arad and the prisons  in Timi\u015foara and Arad, referring in particular to prison overcrowding,  poor-quality food and sanitary conditions. In addition, under Article  8 (right to respect for private and family), he complains about the  offensive smells created by a former refuse tip situated not far from  Arad prison, and the absence of confidentiality during telephone calls  with persons outside the prison.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Paroisse Gr\u00e9co-Catholique Sf\u00e2ntul Vasile Polon\u0103  v. Romania <\/span>(no. 65965\/01)<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\">The applicant is the Greek-Catholic parish of Sf\u00e2ntul  Vasile Polon\u0103, under the authority of the Romanian Archdiocese of Alba  Iulia and F\u0103g\u0103ra\u015f, which is based in Bucharest. Relying on Article  6 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), Article 13 (right  to an effective remedy), Article 9 (right to freedom of thought, conscience  and religion), Article\u00a014 (prohibition of discrimination) and Article  1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), the applicant complains  about two sets of proceedings brought by it against the Orthodox parish  in order to obtain the return of property.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Stoi\u015for and Others v. Romania<\/span> (no. 16900\/03)<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\">The applicants, Ilie Marcel Stoi\u015for, Maria I\u015fa,  Cornelia Stoi\u015for and Carmen Mihaiela Oan\u0103, are Romanian nationals  who were born in 1945, 1921, 1922 and 1955 respectively and live in  Romania. Relying on Article 6 \u00a7 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article  1 of Protocol No.\u00a01 (protection of property), they complain about the  setting aside of a final judgment in their favour concerning a building  they had owned.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\" style=\"margin-top: 12pt;\"><span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;\">Tiron v. Romania <\/span>(no. 17689\/03)<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\">The applicant, Gheorghe Tiron, is a Romanian national  who was born in 1958 and lives in Bucharest. From March 2003 to December  2004 he was placed in pre-trial detention on suspicion, <span class=\"Normal--Char\" style=\"font-style: italic;\">inter alia<\/span>, of tax evasion and forgery. Relying on Article  5 \u00a7 3 (right to liberty and security), he alleges that he was not brought  \u201cpromptly\u201d before an officer authorised by law to exercise judicial  power following his placement in pre-trial detention, and that the Romanian  courts did not give reasons for his continued detention.<\/p>\n<p class=\"Normal\"><a href=\"http:\/\/cmiskp.echr.coe.int\/tkp197\/view.asp?action=html&amp;documentId=848967&amp;portal=hbkm&amp;source=externalbydocnumber&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649\" target=\"_blank\">http:\/\/cmiskp.echr.coe.int\/tkp197\/view.asp?action=html&amp;documentId=848967&amp;portal=hbkm&amp;source=externalbydocnumber&amp;table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8230; pe 9 aprilie, printre altele, se vor pronun\u0163a alte 8 hot\u0103r\u00eeri contra Federa\u0163iei Ruse. Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova (No. 4)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2767,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[2,4,514],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13760"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2767"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13760"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13760\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13762,"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13760\/revisions\/13762"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sergiubrega.com\/curajnet\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}